Dr. Joseph Maroon Sighting in Excellent New Haven Register Article on WWE and Steroids

Don’t Look Now, But Another Pro Wrestler Just Died Young
June 19, 2010
Two New Takes on Linda McMahon: The $$$ Analyst and the Frother
June 22, 2010

Ed Stannard, metro editor of the New Haven Register, has produced one of the most valuable pieces of coverage in the Linda McMahon Senate campaign: an overview of her World Wrestling Entertainment’s history of steroid controversy.

See “Steroid stain lingers over Linda McMahon’s WWE,” http://www.nhregister.com/articles/2010/06/20/news/doc4c1d86ac45467296138524.txt. Equally devastating is the front-page headline in the print edition in capital letters: JUICED.

The Register account is thorough and balanced, and the online version includes links to a lot of important primary-source material. Linda’s BusinessWeek whopper questioning the notion that steroids are bad is given legs.

And it will be open season on her spokesman Ed Patru’s bull about steroids not providing a competitive advantage in pro wrestling because it is scripted. Plenty of credible people can and will contradict them.

I was especially pleased to see that Stannard got WWE’s medical director, Dr. Joseph Maroon, on the record with what I believe are his first public quotes relating to that job since I started zeroing in on the deficiencies of his work and that of other company-contracted doctors — several of whom, like Maroon, are based at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.

I suspect that  when all is said and done, whether Linda McMahon wins or loses in November, a consequence of her candidacy will be more focused heat on the supposedly respectable politicians, doctors, media shills, and others who, by omission or commission, have enabled the McMahon family’s financial and political ascent.

In the case of Dr. Maroon — a neurologist whose work on concussions in the National Football League has been attacked as inadequate and ethically compromised — we now see that he simply parrots the WWE line about the distinction between anabolic steroid abuse and “testosterone replacement therapy.” The company first rolled this out following the 2007 toxicology report on wrestler Chris Benoit, who had murdered his wife and their son before killing himself. Of course, this was only after they had already allowed the public to believe that Benoit had passed his drug tests with flying colors, when in actuality he had off-the-charts quantities of testosterone excused by a get-out-of-jail-free-card “therapeutic use exemption.”

Here’s what Maroon told the  Register:

Maroon said exemptions are given for prohibited drugs if they are administered under a doctor’s care, but that no exemptions are given for anabolic steroids, because they are illegal. Testosterone therapy, he points out, is not the same as steroids.

“There are certain substances, androgenic steroids, that there’s no exemption whatsoever,” Maroon said. “Those are banned substances and under no circumstances are they permitted.”

This is nonsense on androgens — literally and figuratively. The need for therapeutic use of testosterone is wildly exaggerated in wrestling and all of sports. To the extent that it is needed, it was almost always triggered by the original abuse of steroids, which caused the athlete’s endocrine system to malfunction. The net effect of all this is a giant loophole in WWE’s Wellness Policy.

Maroon’s failure to address that question with any nuance marks him as a co-opted professional rather than an independent expert. I expect that, sooner or later, critics will start holding these doctors accountable for lending their good names to WWE.

Irv Muchnick


  1. Keith Harris says:

    Ed Patru, spokesman for McMahon’s campaign, said that while there was no random testing between 1996 and 2006, “the company always maintained the policy of testing for cause and it did so on occasions through that period.”


    Hmm, looks like a guy who clearly couldn’t pass a steroid test between 1998 and 2006.


    Hmm, him too. Seems like WWE had plenty of cause to drug test him, but they never did. You probably could say that about the majority of WWE performers during this period. Someone needs to call out the McMahon campaign on them hiding behind their official policy of testing for cause between 1996 and 2006 when they never used it to test performers who anyone with a brain would suspect of being on steroids.

  2. Bix says:

    Keith gets bonus points for making sure to use an early 2002 pic of Triple H, as that when he was at his most ridiculous.

    Also, the interview where Vince said that probable cause involved needles laying around was during this period.

Concussion Inc. - Author Irvin Muchnick