WWE on Muchnick’s CHRIS & NANCY — The Twitter Daily Dozen for October 30

For a live feed of this continuing series, follow @irvmuch at Twitter.

PARTS 361 – 372

WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 361 retraction and apology should point out the simple truth that neither of you had any factual

WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 362 basis whatsoever for that statement rather than water down the retraction. This is not, as you

WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 363 would suggest, a matter of framing it as some dispute between Meltzer and I over the events

WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 364 in question. Meltzer had no clue-none-as to what was provided at the Aug 14th meeting. I had

WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 365 personal knowledge of what happened since I was there.His report, like yours, was simply false

WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 366 and had no basis in fact, period. Thus, I suggest that you (1) publish my email entirely to you

WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 367 (2) include only Draft Item #1, modified to include the following sentences in the second

WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 368 paragraph after the single sentence you now have: ” I based my accusation on nothing other than

WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 369 a prior written report of Dave Meltzer, which I did nothing to independently confirm as accurate

WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 370 Upon receipt of Mr. McDevitt’s email I contacted Mr. Meltzer and learned that he had no authority

WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 371 or factual basis to state that the WWE received the names of talent on Aug 14th or

WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 372 for the statement that the WWE waited sixteen days to act on such information. Thus, such