Who Was Chris Benoit’s WWE Diva Mistress? A ‘Shocking Omission’ in SLAM! Wrestling Review
October 28, 2009WWE on Muchnick’s CHRIS & NANCY — The Twitter Daily Dozen for October 30
October 30, 2009
PARTS 349 – 360
WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 349 the falsity and the reckless manner in which you published a defamatory statement about me.
WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 350 Previously, you put both of my communications on your blog without permission from me, and now
WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 351 appear more interested in making yourself and Mr. Meltzer look reasonable than correcting
WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 352 the damage you have done. So that your readers know why you are now removing the libel, you should
WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 353 publish the entirety of the email I sent you this morning. Secondly, I am not particularly
WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 354 interested in reading your tribute to Dave Meltzer, whose sloppy reporting was your source
WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 355 for the defamatory statements made about me.The plain reality is you did nothing to confirm
WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 356 basic facts behind your defamatory statement that I had mislead you, as you now admit. You didn’t
WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 357 even attempt to contact the Albany District Attorney, as you know admit, and didn’t contact,
WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 358 or attempt to contact WWE to inquire as to when WWE got the list of names.And, it is now obvious
WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 359 that when you contacted Meltzer he had no source for the statement that we received the names
WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 360 at the Aug. 14th meeting. Rather than putting Meltzer over as an authoritative source, your