CHRIS & NANCY Author Muchnick’s Twitter Feed Publishes WWE Critique
September 30, 2009WWE on Muchnick’s CHRIS & NANCY — The Twitter Daily Dozen for October 1
October 1, 2009
PARTS 1 – 12
WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 1 A Twitter exclusive: my complete June 2008 correspondence with WWE lawyer Jerry McDevitt.
WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 2 Full text also included in the companion DVD marketed with my new book on the Benoit murder-suicide.
WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 3 There will be daily 12-tweet bursts; “Daily Dozen” feed updated collectively at site and blogs.
WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 4 HERE WE GO: Eileen M. Wargo to Irvin Muchnick, 6/16/08 6:59 a.m., “On behalf of Jerry S. McDevitt”
WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 5 Dear Mr. Muchnick: Typically, WWE has ignored your so-called “reporting” and associated attempts
WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 6 to promote your upcoming book seeking to cash in on the murders committed by Chris Benoit
WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 7 last summer. Perhaps you have confused WWE’s disregard of you as a license to print
WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 8 increasingly bizarre and defamatory statements regarding WWE and/or Mr. McMahon in your effort
WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 9 to create some illusion of WWE complicity in Mr. Benoit’s decision to commit
WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 10` capital murder. My purpose in writing is to dispel any such illusion you may have and to advise
WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 11 you of certain facts. Thus, any further repetition of similar falsehoods by you will be treated as
WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 12 a reckless disregard for the truth. We have reviewed certain statements contained in your so-called