Katherine Starr of Safe4Athletes Takes the Easy Way – Settles For a Title on the Advisory Board of USOC’s New Sex Police

UPMC’s Dr. Maroon — ‘The White Coat Who Put the “Inc.” in “Concussion Inc.”‘
February 12, 2015
Why Did the Allentown Morning Call Censor an Op-Ed by Nancy Argentino’s Sisters on the Jimmy Snuka Grand Jury Investigation?
February 13, 2015

by Irvin Muchnick

 

I wrote early and often in praise of Safe4Athletes, the organization founded by former Olympic  swimmer and coach abuse survivor Katherine Starr. See:

https://concussioninc.net/?p=5916

https://concussioninc.net/?p=5936

https://concussioninc.net/?p=5990

https://concussioninc.net/?p=7025

https://concussioninc.net/?p=7204

https://concussioninc.net/?p=7375

https://concussioninc.net/?p=7547

https://concussioninc.net/?p=7910

https://concussioninc.net/?p=8064

https://concussioninc.net/?p=8201

https://concussioninc.net/?p=8436

https://concussioninc.net/?p=8573

But the world turns, and there is nothing to celebrate in this week’s news from Safe4Athletes: the announcement that Starr accepted a spot on the figurehead advisory council for the U.S. Olympic Committee’s  new $5.2 million sex police agency, the “United States Center For Safe Sport.”

On that board – described in the press release as “independent,” naturally – Starr joins such “industry experts in abuse prevention” as Stephanie Smith of the Gundersen Health System’s Child Protection Training Center (misidentified in the USOC press release as “Child Protection Training Services”). Smith’s boss, the center’s director emeritus Victor Vieth, supervised the “independent” review of USA Swimming’s Safe Sport program, which, surprise!, concluded that the program was coming along very nicely. Vieth said his group was paid “around $25,000” for this effort. USA Swimming documents suggest the number was “around $100,000” – and that as a down payment toward untold millions in “expert services” and political cover.

In an email, I asked Starr to explain her mission on the advisory council. She didn’t respond.

In a second email, I asked Starr to disclose the terms of her appointment, monetary and otherwise, as well as the projected operations of the council. Will it meet? When and where and how often? Will it create proactive work product, or simply respond to USOC questions? Or just sit there? Starr didn’t respond to that message, either.

Comments are closed.