WWE on Muchnick’s CHRIS & NANCY — The Twitter Daily Dozen for October 24

For a live feed of this continuing series, follow @irvmuch at Twitter.

PARTS 289 – 300

WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 289 in boldface caps: “THIS POST HAS BEEN DELETED. SEE THE RETRACTION AND APOLOGY AT [URL].”

WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 290 (There are arguments both for and against deleting the original headline. The argument

WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 291 for retaining the headline is that it reinforces the retraction and apology. The argument

WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 292 for deleting the headline is that it somehow perpetuates the original objectionable content,

WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 293 even though the content was deleted and retracted. I will be guided by your wishes on that detail.

WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 294 Please also note that I took the liberty of correcting what seemed to be two typographical errors

WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 295 while quoting your email to me.) I sincerely apologize to you privately for this error, and

WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 296 I will proceed to do so publicly. Please get back to me to confirm that this is agreeable.

WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 297 Irvin Muchnick +++++ DRAFT ITEM #1 RETRACTION AND APOLOGY TO WWE LAWYER JERRY S. McDEVITT

WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 298 An item published on this blog on June 17 under the headline “WWE’s McDevitt (Part 1 of 3): Lawyer

WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 299 Gives Misleading Account of Contact with Albany DA” was incorrect. World Wrestling Entertainment

WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 300 and its lawyer, Jerry S. McDevitt, were notified by the Albany district attorney of the names