ARCHIVE 10/22/08: What It Would Take to Settle the Benoit Wikipedia Hacker Police Video Dispute

ARCHIVE 10/16/08: New Free Shipping Offer on Canadian Orders
May 20, 2009
ARCHIVE 10/22/08: Author Muchnick’s Draft Statement of Facts in ‘Benoit Wikipedia Hacker’ Police Video FOI Case
May 20, 2009
ARCHIVE 10/16/08: New Free Shipping Offer on Canadian Orders
May 20, 2009
ARCHIVE 10/22/08: Author Muchnick’s Draft Statement of Facts in ‘Benoit Wikipedia Hacker’ Police Video FOI Case
May 20, 2009


What It Would Take to Settle the Benoit Wikipedia Hacker Police Video Dispute

Wednesday, October 22nd, 2008

Last week the Connecticut Freedom of Information Commission set a November 21 date for a hearing on my complaint against the Stamford Police Department for failure to release the June 29, 2007, videotaped interrogation of Matthew Greenberg, the “Benoit Wikipedia hacker.”

Through the commission ombudsman, I told Stamford’s assistant city corporation counsel, Michael S. Toma, that a contested hearing could still be forestalled. I suggested a settlement formula whereby I would acquire the video without compromising a future defense by the police of the state FOI issue raised by our dispute. Specifically, Stamford PD would “send a complete, faithful, non-defective copy of the subject record to the Fayette County (Georgia) Sheriff’s Office by a date certain, while so informing both that office and myself. I then would ask the hearing officer to stay our case pending my receiving a copy … from the Fayette County sheriff (as that office has independently promised it would do).”

Irv Muchnick

Comments are closed.

Concussion Inc. - Author Irvin Muchnick