Syndicated Columnist Marvez Interviews Author Muchnick
October 22, 2009Muchnick’s Calgary Radio Interview in Podcast Form
October 23, 2009
PARTS 277 – 288
WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 277 “The meeting with the District Attorney did take place on Aug 14th …” and running through
WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 278 the paragraph beginning “The day that information was finally provided to us, which was Aug 29th,
WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 279 the named talent were summoned to be interviewed immediately at WWE headquarters…” I agree
WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 280 with you that an accurate record of the timing of your actions in this matter is paramount.
WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 281 I will get back to you shortly. Irvin Muchnick
WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 282 Irvin Muchnick email to Jerry McDevitt, 6/18/09 1:45 p.m., “Muchnick to McDevitt”
WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 283 Dear Mr. McDevitt: Per my previous message, I have looked further into your objection
WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 284 about my item about the timing of your actions upon receiving information from the Albany
WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 285 district attorney on Signature Pharmacy. I conclude that you are correct, and that my post and
WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 286 the headline over that post were wrong. Accordingly, I am outlining for you the retraction and
WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 287 apology I contemplate publishing. I am cc’ing my attorney Karl Olson. I would like to take
WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 288 these steps: * Post the two draft items below. * Replace the text of the original post with a note