From San Francisco Chronicle, a Profile in Caution in Cal Football Player Attack

Published April 17th, 2014, Uncategorized

by Irvin Muchnick

 

The San Francisco Chronicle has set the new standard in 21st century corporate journalism: On a story about a premeditated blind-side physical attack, don’t name the assailant; just name the victim!

“Both Cal football players in fight last year return” is the headline today over the article at http://www.sfgate.com/collegesports/article/Both-Cal-football-players-in-fight-last-fall-5408503.php.

Reporter John Crumpacker writes, “The university has not identified the alleged assailant, who has been conditionally reinstated to the team after attending counseling and performing 25 hours of community service.”

The name of J.D. Hinnant — alleged to have sucker-punched Fabiano Hale last November and further struck him on the ground, sending Hale to Alta Bates Hospital with a concussion — is nowhere to be found. Now Hale’s challenge is to show everyone he’s not a wimp after the Chronicle named him as the loser in the “fight” (even plastering his photo in the online version of the piece).

As for Mr. Mystery Attacker? He just has to keep his nose clean … in anonymity.

Below is a reprint of Concussion Inc.’s April 5 takeout on this incident.

We’ll ask Chronicle sports editor Al Saracevic to explain to the public the newspaper’s idiosyncratic discretion. The history of our communications suggests the exercise will be useless.

 

Our (Probably) Final Take on the J.D. Hinnant Altercation With Fabiano Hale in the Cal Football Locker Room

Published April 5th, 2014

by Irvin Muchnick

As the headline reveals, I’m beginning this overdue wrap-up of the November 1, 2013, Cal football player-on-player attack by identifying the person who appears to have been the subject of the investigation by the Alameda County district attorney: J.D. Hinnant, an offensive lineman from Fountain Valley, California.

In doing so, I’m not trying to humiliate the young man. But the local prosecutor, while “deferring” charges in what amounts to a form of pre-trial probation, confirmed that something bad, something criminal, happened. I wish all those involved in the incident best wishes in moving past it. I also believe that naming Hinnant is fundamental to the accountability sought by the D.A.

The victim of the assault, Fabiano Hale, already has been named here and elsewhere – which means that he carries the demented football-culture burden of proving he’s not a “pussy” for having gotten sucker-punched and sent to the emergency room of Berkeley’s Alta Bates Hospital with a concussion. And even worse, for having a nosy journalist invoke him and this episode, in which Hale was an innocent bystander, in a larger critique of how his blood sport is being executed these days at the flagship public university of the nation’s most populous state.

I’ve tried without success to contact Hinnant. The university administration and the prosecutor’s office wouldn’t confirm the name, but one would think they’d have told me I had the wrong one over the course of the several times they were directly asked.

Though neither Hinnant nor Hale was ever the point of this exercise, that piece of business is out of the way.

*****

This article was scheduled for publication more than a month ago, before a reader warned me that it would collide with a memorial service for Ted Agu, the football player who, earlier in February, had collapsed and died while jogging on campus – a tragedy with no connection to the scandalous state of Cal athletics. Unaware of this last round of Agu mourning rituals, I agreed that family and friends and the football community should be allowed to conduct it in peace. It was bad enough that Arkansas coach Bret Bielema incoherently cited Agu’s death, from an undetected congenital condition that had nothing to do with football, in advocating a proposed rule change to curtail no-huddle offenses.

Days earlier, I’d had an extended conversation with Paul Hora, the assistant district attorney who made the call to defer prosecution. I was impressed by Hora’s nuanced approach to his decision.

Our discussion focused on two things. First, Hora noted that prosecutorial discretion involved looking at “the nature of the offense and of the offender.” By this, Hora meant both a sense of proportion in contemplating legal repercussions for a possible one-off lapse in judgment, and an appreciation of the perpetrator’s overall citizenship and remorse. On both scores, the D.A.’s office felt that a just resolution would be to hold off on charges and to monitor the miscreant’s ongoing behavior. Hora emphasized that this was an interim resolution, subject to later introduction of charges if the offender’s behavior warranted it. Fair enough.

The other part of our discussion was trickier, but to his credit, Hora didn’t flinch from it. He listened to the position that the culpability for what happened in the Cal locker room went higher up the chain, to coaches and administrators. Though not part of a criminal prosecutor’s jurisdiction per se, the scrutiny of misdeeds inside public institutions calls for broader examination of management, even as it shows mercy toward individuals.

Our reporting raised serious questions regarding the role of Cal strength and conditioning coach Damon Harrington in lighting the fuse for the attack on Hale, who had missed a group weightlifting session. The coach meted out extra work to the others present, and suggested, in so many words, that they should vent any complaints over the punishment with their absent teammate.

This dynamic betrayed a sick locker room culture: authority figures orchestrating the collective misery of 18-to-22-year-olds programmed for violence at the behest of the adults in control of their careers. When this sort of thing happens in a professional locker room, such as the Miami Dolphins’, we tend to shrug, because the guys are older and are being paid. When it happens in the college football program with, it turns out, the worst statistics in the nation at graduating “revenue sport student-athletes,” a different and sterner response is in order.

And really, it’s time to talk about the practice of round-the-clock booking of college football players. On pain of retraction of year-to-year scholarships, they are at the coaches’ beck and call not just for games on Saturday afternoon (or, it seems just as often, Saturday night or Thursday or Friday, depending on the convenience of television rights-holders), but also for position-group meetings, side conditioning, game film review. Let’s not forget that they also sacrifice personal time for treatment of injuries.

Every bit as pernicious as the (non)-division of the money – billions for the National Collegiate Athletic Association and its members, millions for the coaches, bubkes for the performers – is the stripping of dignity and autonomy. “Voluntary” time commitment, which isn’t voluntary at all, doubles and triples the official workloads spelled out by the NCAA’s rulebook, which is as mendacious as it is thick.

Teams have strength and conditioning coaches in part because college football is an arms race. But much of the underlying purpose of strength coaches is unspoken: they’re yet another way to keep the kids busy. If the players are always thinking about how to become better jocks, then they might not have as much time to ponder the egregious exploitation of their bodies and lives.

These are “non-economic” issues that should be addressed when Ramogi Huma’s College Athletes Players Association eventually takes hold, on the strength of the National Labor Relations Board ruling in favor of the athletes organizing at Northwestern University (and, soon, elsewhere).

Getting back to assistant district attorney Hora, he called my speculation about the possible incitement of Hinnant against Hale a “scenario out of A Few Good Men.” That was Rob Reiner’s 1992 movie, from the Alan Sorkin play, about “code red” extrajudicial punishment in the military.

“I had no evidence of a ‘code red’ here,” Hora said. “That would be a very difficult thing to prove.”

I can’t argue with that. Still, dissatisfaction with Cal athletics under director Sandy Barbour is widespread; among the emails urging me to probe the newly warped values of this intercollegiate sports program were from a retired top university administrator. As San Francisco Chronicle columnist Ann Killon has pointed out, the current news is Barbour’s hire of the DHR International executive headhunting firm to coordinate a nationwide search for retiring basketball coach Mike Montgomery’s successor.

There’s speculation about Barbour’s job security, Killon wrote, “and she may want to make a splashy hire.”

 

Irvin Muchnick’s book, Concussion Inc.: The End of Football As We Know It, will be published this summer by ECW Press. Here are the major headline links to ConcussionInc.net’s coverage of theCal football incident:

 

The Most Telling Concussion in Cal Football Occurred Off the Field

Published November 25th, 2013
***